The phrase “comedy is a serious business” is as old as the hills but it’s true, as I have recently re-realised. Again. A good comedy sketch, like anything else of high quality, often appears effortless – this probably means in reality that a huge amount of work has gone into the making of the sketch to create that effect. Which leads me, perhaps a little confusingly, to Twitter.
Andrew Ellard for example, is someone I discovered through following other folk on Twitter connected to comedy. He’s a script editor, whose credits include Miranda, Red Dwarf and The IT Crowd. He also produces (his hashtag) #tweetnotes on various movies and TV programs he has no working connection with, but shares out of a love of giving insights into all aspects of writing and production (if you’d like to follow him on Twitter, look for @ellardent). It’s fascinating to see the thought processes of an industry professional, with such laser-sharp analysis and frankness about TV and movies. I’ve never met him and I am not on commission, honestly, but it’s a pleasure to tuck into his tweets – for example, here’s a series of tweets of his on the subject of naming characters in Storify form: http://storify.com/ellardent/naming-characters
This stuff is gold dust for a writer.
From my years acting in student theatre, in professional theatre, in improvised comedy and amateur dramatics – all vibrant and useful experience that informs what I’m doing now with TDS – I would categorically state that comedy is much harder to make work on stage than drama. Okay, it’s not open-heart surgery; making comedy isn’t seen as anywhere near as valid or noteworthy a profession (though it’s more well-respected than investment banking right now, but then most things are these days), BUT comedy is tough to get right. Ditto for comedy writing – it’s difficult, a constant learning process!
Even more to the point, I think any kind of creative writing is just damned difficult. My wife is an author, with over 20 published books to her name, but it’s not something she simply delivers into a dictation machine as a highly polished end product – she works damned hard, sometimes agonising over sentences, characters or plot points to make everything work in the best, most believable way.
Maybe I should make it very clear at this point that it’s probably just me that finds sketch writing really difficult…! Yes, it’s all about me me me. Well, it is my blog piece this week! In my time I have written many essays, way too many emails, a terrible dissertation or two at university, and tried to make them all as well-written as possible – but writing a comedy sketch is pretty daunting! It’s early days for me, and I hope that with time I will be able to produce more and better sketches, at a faster rate. But right now, it’s a challenge to keep up with my TDS colleagues, whose volume, and quality of output, frankly terrifies me.
How do I write? Well I’ve tried different methods. The method which has proved most successful for me so far is to free-write for 15 minutes. This is effectively a stream of thought-processes put onto the page in my terrible handwriting (I can’t touch-type, alas) with no punctuation; then, after 15 minutes, I go back through what I have written, decipher it (!) and formulate a sketch from those notes. I have to be in the right frame of mind for free-writing to work, and I have to have given some kind of thought to the sketch in advance, but if you were to write continuously for 15 minutes without stopping, you’d discover that you have more time than you might think to gather your thoughts on the page! Without stopping!
Recently I have had a bit more time (thanks, Christmas holidays) to collaborate with some of my TDS chums on writing in a group session. We have always drawn inspiration from our improvisation sessions and shows, riffing ideas off each other, but taking this into a writing sphere has been quite different and really rewarding. The challenge for me is to find the time to be able to do more writing, by myself and in a group, and to stop finding excuses not to write. Needing sleep, for example. Sleep is for wimps! And for people without kids!
Finally, well, almost finally, some thoughts about character. Having a character in mind, partly- or fully-formed, while writing a sketch, is an important part of my approach. I think my sketches are better read aloud than read on the page – there’s an element that isn’t quite there on the pages of my script, and probably should be there, that helps lift the writing – and that’s the character(s).
Some great examples of this, where the characters add another dimension to the (already great) writing – and I am not suggesting that my writing is on a par with the great writers of these sketches – would be the Two Ronnies’ Four Candles sketch (written by Gerald Wiley aka Ronnie Barker), the Victoria Wood sketch Two Soups, and the Monty Python Argument sketch (written by John Cleese and Graham Chapman) – the difference between reading the scripts to yourself (try imagining that you had never seen the sketches before) and then watching them….there’s quite a difference there!
They are all favourites of mine, classic sketches, possibly too well-known now, but they got to be that way for a reason. Because they are that good. It’s a distant target for my own writing, but it’s definitely something to aim for!